‘Revolution in Permanence’: Popper on Theory-Change in Science

Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 39:75-102 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Science, and in particular the process of theory-change in science, formed the major inspiration for Karl Popper's whole philosophy. Popper learned about the success of Einstein's revolutionary new theory in 1919, and Einstein ‘became a dominant influence on my thinking—in the long run perhaps the most important influence of all.’ Popper explained why:In May, 1919, Einstein's eclipse predictions were successfully tested by two British expeditions. With these tests a new theory of gravitation and a new cosmology suddenly appeared, not just as a mere possibility, but as an improvement on Newton—a better approximation to the truth … The general assumption of the truth of Newton's theory was of course the result of its incredible success, culminating in the discovery of the planet Neptune … Yet in spite of all this, Einstein had managed to produce a real alternative and, it appeared, a better theory … Like Newton himself, he predicted new effects within our solar system. And some of these predictions, when tested, had now proved successful.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Popper's Evolutionary Epistemology Revamped.F. Michael Akeroyd - 2004 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 35 (2):385-396.
Popper's Evolutionary Epistemology Revamped.F. Michael Akeroyd - 2004 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 35 (2):385 - 396.
A Simple Theory-Change Model.Rinat M. Nugayev - 1998 - Epistemologia 21 (2):245-280.
The use and abuse of sir Karl Popper.David L. Hull - 1999 - Biology and Philosophy 14 (4):481-504.
Popper’s paradoxical pursuit of natural philosophy.Nicholas Maxwell - 2004 - In Jeremy Shearmur & Geoffrey Stokes (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Popper. Cambridge University Press. pp. 170-207.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-09

Downloads
112 (#157,657)

6 months
19 (#133,897)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Popper's Darwinian analogy.Bence Nanay - 2011 - Perspectives on Science 19 (3):337-354.
Popper's Evolutionary Epistemology Revamped.F. Michael Akeroyd - 2004 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 35 (2):385 - 396.
Popper's Evolutionary Epistemology Revamped.F. Michael Akeroyd - 2004 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 35 (2):385-396.
Duhem’s Legacy for the Change in the Historiography of Science: An Analysis Based on Kuhn’s Writings.Oliveira Amélia - 2017 - Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science 2:127.

Add more citations

References found in this work

La théorie physique: son objet et sa structure.P. Duhem - 1906 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 61:324-327.
The Uses of Experiment.David Gooding, Trevor Pinch & Simon Schaffer - 1992 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (1):99-109.
Science and Scepticism.John W. N. Watkins - 1984 - Princeton University Press.
Logic of discovery or psychology of invention?Elie Zahar - 1983 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 34 (3):243-261.

Add more references