Hume and Mary Shelley

Notes and Queries 33:164-5 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article suggests that author Mary Shelley takes the phrase "as a true history," and the idea of what it means to respond to a book as to a true history "Treatise of Human Nature," (1739-40). The parallels are obvious; and the purpose of the borrowing is that it helps Mary Shelley suggest the promptness of the Monster's sympathies, and his liveliness of imagination.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,963

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

James Shelley on critical principles.George Dickie - 2003 - British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (1):57-64.
The Human Face of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein.F. P. Crawley - 1996 - Analecta Husserliana 49:195-202.
Hume and the nature of taste.James R. Shelley - 1998 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 56 (1):29-38.
Empiricism: Hutcheson and Hume.James Shelley - 2000 - In Berys Nigel Gaut & Dominic Lopes (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics. Routledge.
Beginning life: Mary Shelley's introduction to Frankenstein.Richard Lansdown - 1995 - Critical Review (University of Melbourne) 35:81.
Hume's double standard of taste.James Shelley - 1994 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 52 (4):437-445.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-06

Downloads
3 (#1,712,809)

6 months
1 (#1,472,961)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references