Breastfeeding and defeasible duties to benefit

Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (8):515-518 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

For many women experiencing motherhood for the first time, the message they receive is clear: mothers who do not breastfeed ought to have good reasons not to; bottle feeding by choice is a failure of maternal duty. We argue that this pressure to breastfeed arises in part from two misconceptions about maternal duty: confusion about the scope of the duty to benefit and conflation between moral reasons and duties. While mothers have a general duty to benefit, we argue that this does not imply a duty to carry out any particular beneficent act. Therefore, the expectation that mothers should breastfeed unless they have sufficient countervailing reasons not to is morally unwarranted. Recognising the difference between reasons and duties can allow us to discuss the benefits of breastfeeding and the importance of supporting mothers who wish to breastfeed without subjecting mothers who bottle feed to guilt, blame and failure.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-10-25

Downloads
272 (#78,100)

6 months
82 (#64,618)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Fiona Woollard
University of Southampton
Lindsey Porter
University of Bristol

References found in this work

What we owe to each other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon - 2002 - Mind 111 (442):323-354.
Shaping the Normative Landscape.David Owens - 2012 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Doing and Allowing Harm.Fiona Woollard - 2015 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Freedom and Resentment and Other Essays.P. F. Strawson - 1976 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 9 (3):185-188.

View all 10 references / Add more references