Regression explanation and statistical autonomy

Biology and Philosophy 34 (5):1-20 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The phenomenon of regression toward the mean is notoriously liable to be overlooked or misunderstood; regression fallacies are easy to commit. But even when regression phenomena are duly recognized, it remains perplexing how they can feature in explanations. This article develops a philosophical account of regression explanations as “statistically autonomous” explanations that cannot be deepened by adducing details about causal histories, even if the explananda as such are embedded in the causal structure of the world. That regression explanations have statistical autonomy was first suggested by Ian Hacking and has recently been defended and elaborated by André Ariew, Yasha Rohwer, and Collin Rice. However, I will argue that these analyses fail to capture what regression’s statistical autonomy consists in and how it sets regression explanations apart from other kinds of explanation. The alternative account I develop also shows what is amiss with a recent denial of regression’s statistical autonomy. Marc Lange has argued that facts that can be explained as regression phenomena can in principle also be explained by citing a conjunction of causal histories. The account of regression explanation developed here shows that his argument is based on a misunderstanding of the nature of statistical autonomy.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Understanding Regression.James Woodward - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:255 - 269.
Understanding Regression.James Woodward - 1988 - PSA Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988 (1):255-269.
Contrastive, non-probabilistic statistical explanations.Bruce Glymour - 1998 - Philosophy of Science 65 (3):448-471.
Are statistical explanations possible?Lorenz Krüger - 1976 - Philosophy of Science 43 (1):129-146.
Really Statistical Explanations and Genetic Drift.Marc Lange - 2013 - Philosophy of Science 80 (2):169-188.


Added to PP

6 (#1,485,580)

6 months
26 (#116,274)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joeri Witteveen
University of Copenhagen

References found in this work

Thinking, Fast and Slow.Daniel Kahneman - 2011 - New York: New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Inference to the Best Explanation.Peter Lipton - 1991 - London and New York: Routledge.
The taming of chance.Ian Hacking - 1990 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 13 references / Add more references