- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Neuroanatomical sex differences: Of no consequence for cognition?
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11 (2):215-217 (1988)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Syntax in the brain: Linguistic versus neuroanatomical specificity.Angela D. Friederici & D. Yves von Cramon - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):32-33.
Neuroanatomical foundations of cognition: Connecting the neuronal level with the study of higher brain areas.Jennifer Mundale - 2001 - In William P. Bechtel, Pete Mandik, Jennifer Mundale & Robert S. Stufflebeam (eds.), Philosophy and the Neurosciences: A Reader. Blackwell. pp. 37--54.
A neuroanatomical model of passivity phenomena.Ralf-Peter Behrendt - 2004 - Consciousness and Cognition 13 (3):579-609.
Phya pa Chos kyi seng ge on Argumentation by Consequence (thal ʼgyur): The Nature, Function, and Form of Consequence Statements.Pascale Hugon - 2013 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 41 (6):671-702.
Irrationality and cognition.John L. Pollock - 2008 - In Quentin Smith (ed.), Epistemology: new essays. New York : Oxford University Press,: Oxford University Press.
Do sex differences in emotionality mediate sex differences in traits of psychosis-proneness?L. M. Williams & J. Barry - 2003 - Cognition and Emotion 17 (5):747-758.
Divine determinism, human freedom, and the consequence argument.Leigh C. Vicens - 2012 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 71 (2):145-155.
Rebuttal analogy and need for cognition individual differences and rebuttal analogy in persuasive messages: Effect of need for cognition.Bryan B. Whaley, Lisa Smith Wagner, Kathleen E. Cook & Natalie Jeha - 2002 - Communication and Cognition. Monographies 35 (3-4):193-209.
Inference, Consequence, Implication: A Constructivist's Perspective.B. G. Sundholm - 1998 - Philosophia Mathematica 6 (2):178-194.
Some thoughts about league tables and public service organisations.Aaron Sloman - 2007 - Aaron Sloman's Online Papers.
Individual differences in the perception of biological motion: Links to social cognition and motor imagery.Luke E. Miller & Ayse P. Saygin - 2013 - Cognition 128 (2):140-148.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-20
Downloads
25 (#627,007)
6 months
11 (#230,668)
2014-01-20
Downloads
25 (#627,007)
6 months
11 (#230,668)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Why are children in the same family so different from one another?Robert Plomin & Denise Daniels - 1987 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10 (1):1-16.
Sex differences in human brain asymmetry: a critical survey.Jeannette McGlone - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (2):215-227.
In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development.Carol Gilligan - 1982 - The Personalist Forum 2 (2):150-152.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-659b74868d-jrkjf uwo