Deep Anthropology: Ecology and Human Order
Environmental Ethics 8 (3):261-270 (1986)
Abstract
Deep ecology has been criticized for being anti-anthropocentric, ignorant of feminism, and utopian. Most of the arguments against deep ecology, however, are based on uncritical use of these terms. Deep ecology places anthropocentrism, feminism, and utopianism into a proper perspective--deep anthropology-which pennits understanding of the human relationships with other beings in nature, in a total-fieldmodel, without accepting unhealthy extremes. The principles of deep ecology are concerned with creating good places, rather than the “no places” of modem industrial culturesISBN(s)
0163-4275
DOI
10.5840/enviroethics1986835
My notes
Similar books and articles
The deep ecology-ecofeminism debate and its parallels.Warwick Fox - 1989 - Environmental Ethics 11 (1):5-25.
Deep Ecology and Ecofeminism: the Self in Environmental Philosophy.Colette Sciberras - 2002 - Dissertation, Lancaster
Dōgen, deep ecology, and the ecological self.Deane Curtin - 1994 - Environmental Ethics 16 (2):195-213.
Deep ecology from the perspective of environmental science.Frank B. Golley - 1987 - Environmental Ethics 9 (1):45-55.
Feminism, Depp ecology, and environmental ethics.Michael E. Zimmerman - 1987 - Environmental Ethics 9 (1):21-44.
Anthropomorphism Without Anthropocentrism: A Wittgensteinian Ecofeminist Alternative to Deep Ecology.Wendy Lee-Lampshire - 1996 - Ethics and the Environment 1 (2):91-102.
Rethinking the Heidegger-Deep Ecology Relationship.Michael E. Zimmerman - 1993 - Environmental Ethics 15 (3):195-224.
On Warwick Fox’s Assessment of Deep Ecology.Harold Glasser - 1997 - Environmental Ethics 19 (1):69-85.
Analytics
Added to PP
2011-12-01
Downloads
24 (#483,430)
6 months
1 (#451,398)
2011-12-01
Downloads
24 (#483,430)
6 months
1 (#451,398)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Anthropocentrism as the scapegoat of the environmental crisis: a review.Laÿna Droz - 2022 - Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 22:25-49.