Model‐Building in Philosophy

In Russell Blackford & Damien Broderick (eds.), Philosophy's Future. Wiley. pp. 159–171 (2017-04-27)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The chapter argues that a model‐building methodology like that widespread in contemporary natural and social science already plays a significant role in philosophy. One neglected form of progress in philosophy over the past fifty years has been the development of better and better formal models of significant phenomena. Examples are given from both philosophy of language and epistemology. Philosophy can do still better in the future by applying model‐building methods more systematically and self‐consciously, with consequent readjustments to its methodology. Although it is neither likely nor desirable for model‐building to become the sole or even main philosophical method, its use enhances the power and reliability of philosophical thinking.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,475

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Carnap’s Early Semantics.Georg Schiemer - 2013 - Erkenntnis 78 (3):487-522.
The Architecture of Meaning: Wittgenstein's Tractatus and formal semantics.Martin Stokhof - 2008 - In D. K. Levy & Alfonso Zamuner (eds.), Wittgenstein’s Enduring Arguments. London: Routledge. pp. 211-244.
Formal epistemology and logic.Horacio Arló-Costa & Eduardo Fermé - 2009 - In Susana Nuccetelli, Ofelia Schutte & Otávio Bueno (eds.), A Companion to Latin American Philosophy. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 482–495.
Non-standard models for formal logics.J. Barkley Rosser & Hao Wang - 1950 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 15 (2):113-129.
Formal semantics in the age of pragmatics.Juan Barba - 2007 - Linguistics and Philosophy 30 (6):637-668.
What is Formal in Formal Semantics?Jan Woleński - 2004 - Dialectica 58 (3):427-436.
What is formal in formal semantics?Jan Woleński - 2004 - Dialectica 58 (3):427–436.
Explicating formal epistemology: Carnap's legacy as Jeffrey's radical probabilism.Christopher F. French - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 53:33–42.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-15

Downloads
48 (#328,462)

6 months
34 (#101,625)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Timothy Williamson
University of Oxford

Citations of this work

The Ethics of Conceptualization: A Needs-Based Approach.Matthieu Queloz - forthcoming - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bayesian Epistemology.William Talbott - 2006 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Modelling in Normative Ethics.Joe Roussos - 2022 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice (5):1-25.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references