Infinite aggregation

Dissertation, Australian National University (2021)

Authors
Hayden Wilkinson
Oxford University
Abstract
Suppose you found that the universe around you was infinite—that it extended infinitely far in space or in time and, as a result, contained infinitely many persons. How should this change your moral decision-making? Radically, it seems, according to some philosophers. According to various recent arguments, any moral theory that is ’minimally aggregative’ will deliver absurd judgements in practice if the universe is (even remotely likely to be) infinite. This seems like sound justification for abandoning any such theory. My goal in this thesis is simple: to demonstrate that we need not abandon minimally aggregative theories, even if we happen to live in an infinite universe. I develop and motivate an extension of such theories, which delivers plausible judgements in a range of realistic cases. I show that this extended theory can overcome key objections—both old and new—and that it succeeds where other proposals do not. With this proposal in hand, we can indeed retain minimally aggregative theories and continue to make moral decisions based on what will promote the good.
Keywords infinite value  decision theory  infinite utility streams  Pareto  aggregation  chaos  cluelessness  consequentialism  utilitarianism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,587
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Infinite Aggregation and Risk.Hayden Wilkinson - forthcoming - Australasian Journal of Philosophy.
Infinite aggregation: expanded addition.Hayden Wilkinson - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 178 (6):1917-1949.
In Defense of Fanaticism.Hayden Wilkinson - 2022 - Ethics 132 (2):445-477.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Infinite Aggregation and Risk.Hayden Wilkinson - forthcoming - Australasian Journal of Philosophy.
In Defense of Fanaticism.Hayden Wilkinson - 2022 - Ethics 132 (2):445-477.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Infinite Aggregation and Risk.Hayden Wilkinson - forthcoming - Australasian Journal of Philosophy.
Infinite aggregation: expanded addition.Hayden Wilkinson - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 178 (6):1917-1949.
Aggregating Infinitely Many Probability Measures.Frederik Herzberg - 2015 - Theory and Decision 78 (2):319-337.
Utilitarianism and Infinite Utility.Peter Vallentyne - 1993 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71 (2):212 – 217.
Transcending the Infinite Utility Debate.Tim Mulgan - 2002 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 80 (2):164 – 177.
Harsanyi's Social Aggregation Theorem and Dictatorship.Osamu Mori - 2003 - Theory and Decision 55 (3):257-272.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-11-18

Total views
1 ( #1,515,470 of 2,461,958 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #448,803 of 2,461,958 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes