A mismatch with dual process models of addiction rooted in psychology

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (4):460-460 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The model of addiction proposed by Redish et al. shows a lack of fit with recent data and models in psychological studies of addiction. In these dual process models, relatively automatic appetitive processes are distinguished from explicit goal-directed expectancies and motives, whereas these are all grouped together in the planning system in the Redish et al. model. Implications are discussed

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Gambling and decision-making: A dual process perspective.Kenny R. Coventry - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (4):444-445.
Addiction science as a hedgehog and as a fox.Warren K. Bickel & Richard Yi - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (4):441-442.
The elephantine shape of addiction.Henry Yin - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (4):461-461.
Neither necessary nor sufficient for addiction.Valerie Gray Hardcastle - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (4):447-448.
Linking addictions to everyday habits and plans.David T. Neal & Wendy Wood - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (4):455-456.
The disunity of Pavlovian and instrumental values.Sean B. Ostlund & Bernard W. Balleine - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (4):456-457.
Social influence and vulnerability.Joseph M. Boden - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (4):442-443.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
36 (#458,158)

6 months
14 (#200,872)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations