A dual-process approach to behavioral addiction: the case of gambling
In Reinout W. Wiers & Alan W. Stacy (eds.), Handbook of Implicit Cognition and Addiction. Sage Publications (2006)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Gambling and decision-making: A dual process perspective.Kenny R. Coventry - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (4):444-445.
A mismatch with dual process models of addiction rooted in psychology.Reinout W. Wiers, Remco Havermans, Roland Deutsch & Alan W. Stacy - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (4):460-460.
A Process Approach to the Utility for Gambling.Marc Le Menestrel - 2001 - Theory and Decision 50 (3):249-262.
Jeux d’argent en ligne. Le double discours français contre l’addiction.Nicolas Oliveri - 2012 - Hermès: La Revue Cognition, communication, politique 62 (1):, [ p.].
Expanding the range of vulnerabilities to pathological gambling: A consideration of over-fast discounting processes.Carl W. Lejuez & Marc N. Potenza - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (4):452-453.
Impulsivity, dual diagnosis, and the structure of motivated behavior in addiction.R. Andrew Chambers - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (4):443-444.
One wrong does not justify another: Accepting dual processes by fallacy of false alternatives.Gideon Keren, Iris van Rooij & Yaacov Schul - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (3):269-270.
Two visual systems and two theories of perception: An attempt to reconcile the constructivist and ecological approaches.Joel Norman - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):73-96.
Adequacy and utility of the dual-process approach to perception: Time (and research) will tell.Joel Norman - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):121-137.
Dual-process theories and hybrid systems.Ilkka Pyysiäinen - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):617-618.
Introspection, confabulation, and dual-process theory.Jonathan St B. T. Evans - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):142-143.
Addiction science as a hedgehog and as a fox.Warren K. Bickel & Richard Yi - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (4):441-442.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-27
Downloads
18 (#615,385)
6 months
1 (#454,876)
2014-01-27
Downloads
18 (#615,385)
6 months
1 (#454,876)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Subtracting “ought” from “is”: Descriptivism versus normativism in the study of human thinking.Shira Elqayam & Jonathan St B. T. Evans - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):251-252.
Subtracting “ought” from “is”: Descriptivism versus normativism in the study of human thinking.Shira Elqayam & Jonathan St B. T. Evans - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):233-248.
Addiction: choice or compulsion?Edmund Henden, Hans Olav Melberg & Ole Rogeberg - 2013 - Frontiers in Psychiatry 4 (77):11.
A unified framework for addiction: Vulnerabilities in the decision process.A. David Redish, Steve Jensen & Adam Johnson - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (4):415-437.