Loss of Epistemic Self-Determination in the Anthropocene

Ethics, Policy and Environment 20 (2):156-167 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

One serious harm facing communities in the Anthropocene is epistemic loss. This is increasingly recognized as a harm in international policy discourses around adaptation to climate change. Epistemic loss is typically conceived of as the loss of a corpus of knowledge, or less commonly, as the further loss of epistemic methodologies. In what follows, I argue that epistemic loss also can involve the loss of epistemic self-determination, and that this framework can help to usefully examine adaptation policies.

Similar books and articles

The Climate Change Debate: An Epistemic and Ethical Enquiry.David Coady & Richard Corry - 2013 - New York, NY: Palgrave-Macmillan. Edited by Richard Corry.
How Not to Save the Planet.Thom Brooks - 2016 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 19 (2):119-135.
Managing Climate Change: A View from Deep Ecology.Patrik Baard - 2015 - Ethics and the Environment 20 (1):23-44.
Climate Change Justice.Darrel Moellendorf - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (3):173-186.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-06-28

Downloads
640 (#26,885)

6 months
92 (#49,688)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ian Werkheiser
University Of Texas Rio Grande VAlley

Citations of this work

Resisting Structural Epistemic Injustice.Michael Doan - 2018 - Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 4 (4).

Add more citations

References found in this work

Deliberative Democracy and the Discursive Dilemma.Philip Pettit - 2001 - Philosophical Issues 11 (1):268-299.
A Measure of Freedom.Ian Carter (ed.) - 1999 - Oxford University Press UK.
A Measure of Freedom.Ian Carter (ed.) - 1999 - Oxford University Press.
A Measure of Freedom.Ian Carter - 2001 - Law and Philosophy 20 (5):531-540.

View all 12 references / Add more references