Review of Abortion and Moral Theory [Book Review]

Philosophical Review 93 (1):97 (1984)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Criticism of a moral theorizing that disparages common moral thought for violating presumed a priori principles. Argues for questioning alleged principles.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/2184415

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Moral Principles of Action.Wayne A. R. Leys & Ruth Nanda Anshen - 1954 - Philosophical Review 63 (1):127.
The Principles of Moral Judgement.W. K. Frankena & W. D. Lamont - 1948 - Philosophical Review 57 (1):89.
Moral Principles and Political Obligations.Diana T. Meyers - 1981 - Philosophical Review 90 (3):472.
Moral dilemmas.E. J. Lemmon - 1962 - Philosophical Review 71 (2):139-158.
Moral Values, A Study of the Principles of Conduct. [REVIEW]Frank Chapman Sharp - 1918 - Philosophical Review 27 (5):531-535.
Creation and Abortion: A Study in Moral and Legal Philosophy.Mary Anne Warren & F. M. Kamm - 1994 - Philosophical Review 103 (4):729.
Three Traditions of Moral Thought.Stuart M. Brown - 1961 - Philosophical Review 70 (1):126.
A Study in Moral Theory.Warner Fite - 1927 - Philosophical Review 36 (2):183.
The Moral Basis of Burke’s Political Thought.H. Mark Roelofs - 1958 - Philosophical Review 67 (3):427.
Hume's Moral Theory.Judith Slein - 1982 - Philosophical Review 91 (2):269.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-31

Downloads
298 (#70,838)

6 months
64 (#86,739)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Roger Wertheimer
Agnes Scott College

Citations of this work

Recent work in feminist ethics.Brennan Samantha - 1999 - Ethics 109 (4):858-893.
What is Utility?D. W. Haslett - 1990 - Economics and Philosophy 6 (1):65.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references