Jealousy: a response to infidelity? On the nature and appropriateness conditions of jealousy

Philosophical Explorations 20 (3):322-337 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper critically assesses the widespread claim that jealousy is a response to infidelity. According to this claim, herewith called the entitlement theory, jealousy is only an appropriate response to a relationship between a loved one and a rival if, by entertaining this relationship, the loved one does not treat the jealous person the way she is entitled to be treated. I reconstruct different versions of ET, each of them providing a different answer to the question why we should assume that jealousy is a response to infidelity. I show that even the most plausible versions enjoy less argumentative support than it seems at first sight. The positive aim of this paper is to present a more inclusive account of jealousy as an alternative to ET. According to this account, jealousy serves to disturb the rival relationship and to gain the attention and affection of the loved person. Jealousy so understood is not only an appropriate response to infidelity but has wider appropriateness conditions. However, it plays a role in the negotiation of norms concerning exclusivity in personal relationships. The inclusive account does justice to the continuity and commonalities between adult and infant protest against rival relationships.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Jealousy, shame, and the rival.Jeffrie G. Murphy - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 108 (1-2):143 - 150.
Jealous thoughts.Jerome Neu - 1980 - In Amélie Rorty (ed.), Explaining Emotions. Univ of California Pr. pp. 425--463.
Jealousy in relation to envy.Luke Purshouse - 2004 - Erkenntnis 60 (2):179-205.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-04-12

Downloads
102 (#174,706)

6 months
28 (#111,999)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Anna Welpinghus
Ruhr-Universität Bochum

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The emotions: a philosophical introduction.Julien A. Deonna & Fabrice Teroni - 2012 - New York: Routledge. Edited by Fabrice Teroni.
The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration.Peter Goldie - 2000 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
The Moralistic Fallacy.Daniel Jacobson - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (1):65-90.
The Moralistic Fallacy: On the 'Appropriateness' of Emotions.Justin D'Arms & Daniel Jacobson - 2000 - Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 61 (1):65-90.

View all 28 references / Add more references