Clinical ethics: Theory or practice?

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (3):295-312 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article starts with a brief historical account of the ongoing debate about the status of clinical ethics: theory of practice. The author goes on to argue that clinical ethics is best understood as a practice. However, its practicality should not be measured by the extent to which clinical-ethical consultants manage to mediate or negotiate resolutions to ethical conflicts. Rather, clinical ethics is practical because it is characterized by a profound concern for the well-being of individual patients as well as the moral parameters of swift and urgent medical action in the face of limited supportive information.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Steps towards a theory of medical practice.Peter Hucklenbroich - 1998 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (3):215-228.
Moral Expertise in the Context of Clinical Ethics Consultation.Jeffrey Byrnes & Geert Craenen - 2018 - In Jamie Carlin Watson & Laura K. Guidry-Grimes (eds.), Moral Expertise: New Essays from Theoretical and Clinical Bioethics. Springer International Publishing.
The clinical ethicist at the bedside.John Puma & David L. Schiedermayer - 1991 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 12 (2).
What kind of doing is clinical ethics?George J. Agich - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (1):7-24.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
64 (#259,275)

6 months
6 (#587,779)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Voices and time: The venture of clinical ethics.Richard M. Zaner - 1993 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (1):9-31.

Add more references