The States' Role in National Health Reform

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (4):690-692 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The respective roles of states and the federal government in health reform is a defining feature of any proposal. Heterogeneity among states implies the need for different approaches in different places, but a possible consequence is variation in results and outcomes around the nation

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Enterprise association or civil association? The uk national health service.Andrew Edgar - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (6):669-688.
Health care reform and abortion: A catholic moral perspective.James T. McHugh - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (5):491-500.
Ethicists and health care reform: An indecent proposal?Laurence J. O'Connell - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (5):419-424.
National Health Care Reform and the Public's Health.Corey S. Davis & Sarah Somers - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (s1):65-68.
Why Can’t We Do What They Do? National Health Reform Abroad.Timothy Stoltzfus Jost - 2004 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 32 (3):433-441.
John Stuart Mill on Health Care Reform.Sean Donaghue Johnston - 2011 - Social Philosophy Today 27:63-74.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
9 (#1,254,142)

6 months
3 (#976,478)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references