Rawlsian Liberalism and the Privatization of Religion: Three Theological Objections Considered

Journal of Religious Ethics 22 (1):3 - 28 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Liberal political theorists are often accused of "privatizing" religion; the work of philosopher John Rawls has been especially subject to this criticism. I begin by examining what is meant by "privatization." I then consider the criticisms of Rawls advanced by Timothy Jackson, David Hollenbach, and John Langan. I argue (1) that Rawls does not privatize religion to the extent that his critics believe and (2) that criticisms of what privatization of religion Rawls does defend cannot be sustained.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,271

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Public Reason/Private Religion? A Response to Paul J. Weithman.David Hollenbach - 1994 - Journal of Religious Ethics 22 (1):39 - 46.
Liberalism, Religion And Integrity.Kevin Vallier - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (1):149-165.
Political liberalism, basic liberties, and legal paternalism.William Glod - 2010 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 48 (2):177-196.
John Rawls.Sebastiano Maffettone - 2001 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 1 (3):189-216.
Rawls's political postmodernism.Donald Beggs - 1999 - Continental Philosophy Review 32 (2):123-141.


Added to PP

36 (#429,312)

6 months
6 (#506,019)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Weithman
University of Notre Dame

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references