Greatest surprise reduction semantics: an information theoretic solution to misrepresentation and disjunction

Philosophical Studies 177 (8):2185-2205 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Causal theories of content, a popular family of approaches to defining the content of mental states, commonly run afoul of two related and serious problems that prevent them from providing an adequate theory of mental content—the misrepresentation problem and the disjunction problem. In this paper, I present a causal theory of content, built on information theoretic tools, that solves these problems and provides a viable model of mental content. This is the greatest surprise reduction theory of content, which identifies the content of a signal as the event the surprisal of which is most reduced by that signal. Conceptually, this amounts to the claim that the content of a signal is the event the probability of which has increased by the largest proportion, or the event that the signal makes the most less surprising to us. I develop the greatest surprise reduction theory of content in four stages. First, I introduce the general project of causal theories of content, and the challenges presented to this project by the misrepresentation and disjunction problems. Next, I review two recent and prominent causal theories of content and demonstrate the serious challenges faced by these approaches, both clarifying the need for a solution to the misrepresentation and disjunction problems and providing a conceptual background for the greatest surprise reduction theory. Then, I develop the greatest surprise reduction theory of content, demonstrate its ability to resolve the misrepresentation and disjunction problems, and explore some additional applications it may have. Finally, I conclude with a discussion of a particularly difficult challenge that remains to be addressed—the partition problem—and sketch a path to a potential solution.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Content Naturalized.Luciano B. Mariano - 1999 - Philosophical Studies 96 (2):205-238.
Propositional Content in Signalling Systems.Jonathan Birch - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 171 (3):493-512.
The Semantics Latent in Shannon Information.M. C. Isaac Alistair - 2019 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 70 (1):103-125.
The Solution to the Surprise Exam Paradox.Ken Levy - 2009 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 (2):131-158.
Mice, shrews, and misrepresentation.Austen Clark - 1993 - Journal of Philosophy 90 (6):290-310.
Meaning and dialogue coherence: A proof-theoretic investigation.Paul Piwek - 2007 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16 (4):403-421.
A Generalization of Inquisitive Semantics.Vít Punčochář - 2016 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 45 (4):399-428.
Some Concerns Regarding Ternary-relation Semantics and Truth-theoretic Semantics in General.Ross T. Brady - 2017 - IfCoLog Journal of Logics and Their Applications 4 (3):755--781.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-07-05

Downloads
43 (#364,264)

6 months
4 (#790,778)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel Weissglass
Duke Kunshan University

Citations of this work

Is radically enactive imagination really contentless?Marco Facchin - 2022 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 21 (5):1089-1105.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Intention.G. E. M. Anscombe - 1957 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Knowledge and the flow of information.F. Dretske - 1989 - Trans/Form/Ação 12:133-139.

View all 26 references / Add more references