The intensive statement of particular and negative propositions

Philosophical Review 5 (4):403-405 (1896)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/2175505

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Statement and Inference.H. R. Smart - 1927 - Philosophical Review 36 (6):599.
Propositions.Jenny Teichmann - 1961 - Philosophical Review 70 (4):500-517.
Are all necessary propositions analytic?Arthur Pap - 1949 - Philosophical Review 58 (4):299-320.
Emotive Propositions.George Pitcher & Soren Hallden - 1956 - Philosophical Review 65 (1):107.
The meaning of ethical propositions.John A. Clark - 1947 - Philosophical Review 56 (6):631-644.
Paradoxes, posits and propositions.P. F. Strawson - 1967 - Philosophical Review 76 (2):214-219.
Outline of a Nominalist Theory of Propositions. [REVIEW]Dale Gottlieb - 1985 - Philosophical Review 94 (1):115-117.
The calculus of propositions and self-contradiction.A. P. Ushenko - 1939 - Philosophical Review 48 (3):322-325.
Arthur Pap's analysis of necessary propositions.A. Campbell Garnett - 1950 - Philosophical Review 59 (3):370-374.
Confusion about exclusive and exceptive propositions.Eleanor Bisbee - 1937 - Philosophical Review 46 (1):85-88.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
12 (#1,091,966)

6 months
1 (#1,721,226)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references