The meaning of ethical propositions

Philosophical Review 56 (6):631-644 (1947)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/2181951

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Propositions.Jenny Teichmann - 1961 - Philosophical Review 70 (4):500-517.
Are all necessary propositions analytic?Arthur Pap - 1949 - Philosophical Review 58 (4):299-320.
Emotive Propositions.George Pitcher & Soren Hallden - 1956 - Philosophical Review 65 (1):107.
The Ethics of Homicide, and John Ladd, Ethical Issues Relating to Life and Death. [REVIEW]Gregory W. Trianosky-Stillwell - 1981 - Philosophical Review 90 (4):633-637.
Paradoxes, posits and propositions.P. F. Strawson - 1967 - Philosophical Review 76 (2):214-219.
Outline of a Nominalist Theory of Propositions. [REVIEW]Dale Gottlieb - 1985 - Philosophical Review 94 (1):115-117.
The calculus of propositions and self-contradiction.A. P. Ushenko - 1939 - Philosophical Review 48 (3):322-325.
Arthur Pap's analysis of necessary propositions.A. Campbell Garnett - 1950 - Philosophical Review 59 (3):370-374.
Confusion about exclusive and exceptive propositions.Eleanor Bisbee - 1937 - Philosophical Review 46 (1):85-88.
The intensive statement of particular and negative propositions.Margaret Washburn - 1896 - Philosophical Review 5 (4):403-405.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
17 (#213,731)

6 months
4 (#1,635,958)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references