Utopian and Scientific Enactivism: Never Ever Getting Back Together?

Constructivist Foundations 19 (1):19-21 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Meyer and Brancazio make an important distinction between two enactivist projects: “utopian” and “scientific.” I agree that contemporary enactivists would benefit from more clearly distinguishing these projects and their success conditions. However, I wonder whether there are times when letting these projects merge with each other might be helpful, or even necessary.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Enactivism: Utopian & Scientific.Russell Meyer & Nick Brancazio - 2023 - Constructivist Foundations 19 (1):1-11.
Phenomenological Teleology and Human Interactivity.R. Gahrn-Andersen & M. I. Harvey - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):224-226.
Enactivism.Daniel D. Hutto - 2023 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Cognitive Embodiment and Anxiety Disorders.Dan J. Stein - 2020 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 27 (1):53-55.
Against the Explanatory Argument for Enactivism.Leonard Dung - 2022 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 29 (7-8):57-68.
Why Not Both? Interaction and the Individual in Enactivism.Nick Brancazio - 2023 - Constructivist Foundations 18 (3):380-382.
The coherence of enactivism and mathematics education research: A case study.David A. Reid - 2014 - Avant: Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies (2):137-172.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-02-01

Downloads
89 (#188,860)

6 months
89 (#50,350)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?