Regret. A study in Ancient Moral Psychology

Oxford: Oxford University Press (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This book provides a study of regret (metameleia) in the moral psychology of Plato, Aristotle, and the Stoics. It was important for all these philosophers to insist that regret is a characteristic of neither fully virtuous nor wholly irredeemable characters. Rather, they took regret to be something that affects people who retrospectively feel pain at realising an earlier mistaken action. Regret sets out in full the accounts of the nature of this emotion found in the works of these philosophers, viewing them in the context of their respective accounts of virtuous and non-virtuous agents, ethical progress, the role of knowledge in producing good actions, and compares it with modern philosophical notions of 'agent regret'.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reasonable Regret.Maura Priest - 2019 - In Anna Gotlib & Mark Alfano (eds.), The Moral Psychology of Regret. Rowman & Littlefield International.
Is Agent-Regret Rational?David Sussman - 2018 - Ethics 128 (4):788-808.
Regret and Obligation.Juha Räikkä - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 12:24-29.
The Moral Psychology of Regret.Anna Gotlib & Mark Alfano (eds.) - 2019 - Rowman & Littlefield International.
The Purity of Agent-Regret.Jake Wojtowicz - 2022 - Philosophy 97 (1):71-90.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-03-21

Downloads
9 (#1,266,389)

6 months
7 (#592,867)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Warren
Cambridge University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references