A Miserable Argument

In Marc Champagne (ed.), Sam Harris: Critical Responses. Carus Books. pp. 115-25 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his arguments that science itself can answer moral questions, Sam Harris often appeals to our intuitions about the badness of suffering. If we share these intuitions, Harris argues, we’ve taken a significant step in conceding to a basically utilitarian worldview. In this chapter, I critically assess Harris’ arguments and find them deeply wanting.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-20

Downloads
569 (#33,337)

6 months
358 (#5,507)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark Warren
University of New South Wales

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references