Hutcheson and Kant: Moral Sense and Moral Feeling

In Elizabeth Robinson & Chris W. Surprenant (eds.), Kant and the Scottish Enlightenment. New York: Routledge. pp. 36-54 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

My aim in this paper is to discuss Kant’s engagement with what is arguably the core feature of Hutcheson’s moral sense theory, namely the idea that the moral sense is the foundation of moral judgement. In section one I give an account of Hutcheson’s conception of the moral sense. This sense is a perceptive faculty that explains our ability both to feel a particular kind of pleasure upon perceiving benevolence, and to appraise such benevolence as morally good on the basis of this feeling. Section two summarizes Kant’s discussion of the moral sense during his pre-Critical period. Kant’s appraisal of the concept changes during this time and culminates in the 1769/70 rejection of the moral sense as the foundation of moral judgement. In section three I turn to the main reason why Kant rejects the moral sense as the foundation of moral judgement, namely because it is incapable of issuing sufficiently universal and necessary judgements of moral good and evil. I argue that underlying Kant’s rejection of the moral sense is the fact that he understands the faculty not as a “sense” proper, but as a “feeling” according to his technical understanding of these terms. In the fourth section I conclude by briefly evaluating what my analysis says about Kant’s engagement with Hutcheson. I suggest that while Kant never accepted the existence of a moral sense, Hutcheson’s position was a view with which Kant often contrasted his own, and as such it played an important role in the development and expression of Kant’s mature moral philosophy.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Apriority of Moral Feeling.Susan M. Purviance - 1999 - Idealistic Studies 29 (1-2):75-87.
Making Sense of Moral Perception.Rafe McGregor - 2015 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (4):745-758.
Moral Feeling and Moral Conversion in Kant's "Religion".Laura Papish - 2013 - Idealistic Studies 43 (1-2):11 - 26.
Anthropology from a metaphysical point of view.Jeanine Grenberg - 1999 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 37 (1):91-115.
Ethical Externalism and the Moral Sense.Susan M. Purviance - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Research 27:585-600.
How to Be a Moral Taste Theorist.John McAteer - 2016 - Essays in Philosophy 17 (1):05-21.
Kant on Moral Satisfaction.Michael Walschots - 2017 - Kantian Review 22 (2):281-303.
On Three Defenses of Sentimentalism.Noriaki Iwasa - 2013 - Prolegomena 12 (1):61-82.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-10-03

Downloads
199 (#99,496)

6 months
121 (#33,195)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Walschots
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz

Citations of this work

Hutcheson and his Critics and Opponents on the Moral Sense.Ruth Boeker - 2022 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 20 (2):143-161.
Conceptual Analysis and the Analytic Method in Kant’s Prize Essay.Gabriele Gava - 2024 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 14 (1):164-184.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Shaftesbury and Hutcheson.Thomas Fowler - 2019 - Wentworth Press.
Gesammelte Schriften.Moses Mendelssohn & Ismar Elbogen - 1844 - Berlin,: Akademie Verlag. Edited by Ismar Elbogen, Julius Guttmann, Eugen Mittwoch, Fritz Bamberger, Haim Bar-Dayan, Simon Rawidowicz, Bruno Strauss & Leo Strauss.

View all 13 references / Add more references