Art forgeries and inherent value

British Journal of Aesthetics 27 (4):358-362 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/bjaesthetics/27.4.358

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Versions and "versions," forgeries and "forgeries": A response to Kirk pillow.Peter Kivy - 2002 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60 (2):180-182.
Fakes and forgeries.Hunter Steele - 1977 - British Journal of Aesthetics 17 (3):254-258.
Art and Value. [REVIEW]Christopher Bartel - 2005 - British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (1):94-96.
Art and value.John Bruce - 1966 - British Journal of Aesthetics 6 (2):123-134.
Art and value.G. Dickie - 2000 - British Journal of Aesthetics 40 (2):228-241.
Aesthetic appreciation and the imperceptible.Joseph Margolis - 1976 - British Journal of Aesthetics 16 (4):305-312.
Art Historical Value.Alan H. Goldman - 1993 - British Journal of Aesthetics 33 (1):17-28.
Review: Art and Value. [REVIEW]Christopher Bartel - 2005 - British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (1):94-96.
"But is it Art?: The Value of Art and the Temptation of Theory": B. R. Tilghman. [REVIEW]R. A. Sharpe - 1985 - British Journal of Aesthetics 25 (3):285.
Clive bell and G. E. Moore: The good of art.Jeffrey T. Dean - 1996 - British Journal of Aesthetics 36 (2):135-145.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
71 (#80,786)

6 months
71 (#224,364)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The empathy principle: Towards a model for the psychology of art.W. Ray Crozier & Paul Greenhalgh - 1992 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 22 (1):63–79.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references