Versions and "versions," forgeries and "forgeries": A response to Kirk pillow

Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60 (2):180-182 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The aesthetic status of forgeries.Mark Sagoff - 1976 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 35 (2):169-180.
Versions and forgeries: A response to Kivy.Kirk Pillow - 2002 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60 (2):177-179.
Intentional forgeries and accidental versions: A response to John Dilworth.Peter Kivy - 2002 - British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (4):419-422.
Forgeries of Plautus.H. D. Jocelyn - 1981 - The Classical Review 31 (02):196-.
Scipionic Forgeries.Edwin W. Fay - 1920 - Classical Quarterly 14 (3-4):163-.
Fakes and forgeries.Hunter Steele - 1977 - British Journal of Aesthetics 17 (3):254-258.
Art forgeries and inherent value.G. Wallace - 1987 - British Journal of Aesthetics 27 (4):358-362.
Literary Forgeries and Fabrications in Antiquity. [REVIEW]G. B. Kerferd - 1976 - The Classical Review 26 (1):57-59.
Fakes and forgeries.Nan Stalnaker - 2000 - In Berys Nigel Gaut & Dominic Lopes (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics. Routledge.
Historical context and the aesthetic evaluation of forgeries.Roger Clark - 1984 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 22 (3):317-321.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
20 (#744,405)

6 months
3 (#1,023,809)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references