"Movie Man": David Thomson [Book Review]

British Journal of Aesthetics 8 (2):204 (1968)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,610

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Innocent Burdens.James Edwin Mahon - 2014 - Washington and Lee Law Review 71.
Movie Medievalism: The Imaginary Middle Ages. [REVIEW]David Marshall - 2009 - The Medieval Review 7.
The Light of Truth and Beauty: The Lectures of Alexander 'Greek' Thomson, Architect, 1817-1875.Alexander Thomson - 1999
Technologies of Ideology: A Contribution to a Critique of Movie Theory.Jay Raskin - 1997 - Dissertation, University of South Florida
Entre arquiteturas e imagens em movimento: cinemas, corporeidades e espectação cinematográfica na Tijuca.Talitha Ferraz - 2010 - Logos: Comuniação e Univerisdade 17 (1):43-55.
Philosophie et Esthetique Chez David Hume by O. Brunet. [REVIEW]Arthur Thomson - 1967 - Philosophical Quarterly 17 (69):378.
No Title available.David Thomson - 1950 - Philosophy 25 (92):80-81.
The ontic and the ontological in Heidegger's philosophy of technology: Response to Thomson.Andrew Feenberg - 2000 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (4):445 – 450.
Spielberg's ai: Another cuddly no-brainer.Stevan Harnad - 2001
No title available: New books. [REVIEW]David Thomson - 1939 - Philosophy 14 (53):114-115.
The prescription of antidepressants in general practice. 1.C. Thomson & C. M. Thomson - 1989 - A Critical Review. Hum Psychopharmacol 4:91-102.
Re-reading Thomson: Thomson's unanswered challenge.Michael Watkins - 2006 - Journal of Libertarian Studies 20 (4):41-59.
J. J. Thomson: The discovery of the electron and the chemists.Michael Chayut - 1991 - Annals of Science 48 (6):527-544.
How not to derive "ought" from "is".James Thomson & Judith Thomson - 1964 - Philosophical Review 73 (4):512-516.
THOMSON, J. J. and THOMSON, G. P. - Conduction of Electricity through Gazes. [REVIEW]A. Boutaric - 1930 - Scientia 24 (48):182.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references