Innocent Burdens

Washington and Lee Law Review 71 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article Judith Jarvis Thomson's Good Samaritan Argument in defense of abortion in the case of rape is defended from two objections: the Kill vs. Let Die Objection, and the Intend to Kill vs. Merely Foresee Death Objection. The article concludes that these defenses do not defend Thomson from further objections from Peter Singer and David Oderberg.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Responsibility Objection to Thomson Re-imagined: What If Men Were Held to a Parallel Standard?Vicki Toscano - 2023 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 16 (2):26-45.
Abortion and Ownership.John Martin Fischer - 2013 - The Journal of Ethics 17 (4):275-304.
Is pregnancy really a good Samaritan act?Bruce P. Blackshaw - 2021 - Christian Bioethics 27 (2):158–168.
Defusing Thomson's Violinist Analogy.Mathew Lu - 2013 - Human Life Review 39 (1):46-62.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-12-18

Downloads
134 (#141,354)

6 months
1,591 (#502)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Mahon
Lehman College (CUNY)

Citations of this work

Abortion and the Right to not be Pregnant.James Mahon - 2016 - In Mahon James (ed.), Philosophy and Political Engagement. Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 57-77.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references