The Myth of the Gendered Chromosome: Sex Selection and the Social Interest

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (1):7-19 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Sex selection technologies have become increasingly prevalent and accessible. We can find them advertised widely across the Internet and discussed in the popular media—an entry for “sex selection services” on Google generated 859,000 sites in April 2004. The available services fall into three main types: preconception sperm sorting followed either by intrauterine insemination of selected sperm or by in vitro fertilization ; preimplantation genetic diagnosis, by which embryos created by IVF are tested and only those of the desired sex are transferred to the woman's uterus; and prenatal testing of fetuses through ultrasound or chromosomal analysis, followed by selective abortion of fetuses detected to be of the undesired sex

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sex Selection and the Procreative Liberty Framework.Inmaculada de Melo-Martín - 2013 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 23 (1):1-18.
Sex Differences in Moral Interests: The Role of Kinship and the Nature of Reciprocity.Deborah Mower - 2009 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 39 (1):111-119.
Sex, gender, and science.Myra J. Hird - 2004 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
99 (#174,899)

6 months
17 (#147,509)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Susan Sherwin
Dalhousie University

Citations of this work

How Sex Selection Undermines Reproductive Autonomy.Tamara Kayali Browne - 2017 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14 (2):195-204.
A Feminist Critique of Justifications for Sex Selection.Tereza Hendl - 2017 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14 (3):427-438.
Justice in the Context of Family Balancing.Richard R. Sharp & Michelle L. McGowan - 2013 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 38 (2):271-293.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references