A Group Epistemology is a Group Necessity: A Reply to Fallis and Mathiesen

Social Epistemology 27 (1):26 - 31 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

(2013). A Group Epistemology is a Group Necessity: A Reply to Fallis and Mathiesen. Social Epistemology: Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 26-31. doi: 10.1080/02691728.2012.760667

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Pluralism About Group Knowledge: A Reply to Jesper Kallestrup.Avram Hiller & R. Wolfe Randall - 2023 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (1):39-45.
Group knowledge and group rationality: a judgment aggregation perspective.Christian List - 2011 - In Alvin I. Goldman & Dennis Whitcomb (eds.), Social Epistemology: Essential Readings. New York: Oxford University Press.
The Epistemology of Groups.Jennifer Lackey - 2020 - New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
A Knowledge-First Account of Group Knowledge.Domingos Faria - 2022 - Logos and Episteme 13 (1):37-53.
Epistemic autonomy and group knowledge.Chris Dragos - 2019 - Synthese 198 (7):6259-6279.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-03

Downloads
27 (#578,523)

6 months
3 (#1,206,820)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Knowledge in a social world.Alvin I. Goldman - 1991 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The morality of happiness.Julia Annas - 1993 - New York: Oxford University Press.
White Ignorance.Charles Mills - 2007 - In Shannon Sullivan & Nancy Tuana (eds.), Race and Epistemologies of Ignorance. State Univ of New York Pr. pp. 11-38.
Modelling collective belief.Margaret Gilbert - 1987 - Synthese 73 (1):185-204.

View all 21 references / Add more references