The controversy between John H. Northrop and Max Delbrück on the formation of bacteriophage: Bacterial synthesis or autonomous multiplication?

Annals of Science 49 (6):545-575 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

SummaryIn the 1940s a controversy developed between John H. Northrop (Nobel Laureate, 1946) and Max Delbrück (Nobel Laureate, 1969) on the formation of bacteriophage. From the historiography of molecular biology there emerges a picture of an obstinate Northrop who repudiated the ‘correct’ insights revealed by the experiments of Delbrück. The established reputation of Northrop confronts one with the question of why Delbrück's epoch-making experiments were not convincing for Northrop. It will be argued that this was a consequence of local incommensurability between Northrop's physiological/chemical research style and Delbrück's bacteriological/genetic research style. The analysis of this controversy reveals the elements that made up these two research styles.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Temporal aspects of simple multiplication and comparison.John M. Parkman - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 95 (2):437.
McAllister on Northrop.Fred Seddon - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Research 18:261-269.
Le bactériophage, la lysogénie et son déterminisme génétique.Charles Galperin - 1987 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 9 (2):175 - 224.
Northrop on Russian communism.Fred A. Seddon - 1986 - Studies in East European Thought 32 (2):133-154.
Extreme pleomorphism and the bacterial life cycle: a forgotten controversy.Milton Wainwright - 1997 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 40 (3):407-414.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
45 (#351,738)

6 months
7 (#420,337)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Bringing physics to bear on the phenomenon of life: the divergent positions of Bohr, Delbrück, and Schrödinger.Andrew T. Domondon - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 37 (3):433-458.
The study of lysogeny at the Pasteur Institute (1950–1960): an epistemologically open system.Nadine Peyrieras & Michel Morange - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 33 (3):419-430.
When viruses were not in style: Parallels in the histories of chicken sarcoma viruses and bacteriophages.Neeraja Sankaran - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 48:189-199.
Bringing physics to bear on the phenomenon of life: the divergent positions of Bohr, Delbrück, and Schrödinger.Andrew T. Domondon - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 37 (3):433-458.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
Kuhn's conception of incommensurability.Paul Hoyningen-Huene - 1990 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 21 (3):481-492.
Phage and the Origins of Molecular Biology.J. Cairns, G. S. Stent & J. D. Watson - 1968 - Journal of the History of Biology 1 (1):155-161.

View all 9 references / Add more references