Playing Flourens to Fodor's Gall

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):84-84 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s0140525x00033550

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Auguste Comte et la physiologie cérébrale de son temps.Jean-Gaël Barbara - 2012 - Revue d'Histoire des Sciences 65 (2):213-236.
Organology and modularity: One piece of the mind or two?Helmut Hildebrandt - 1994 - Philosophical Psychology 7 (1):21-38.
Why Fodor can't have it both ways.Michael Devitt - 1991 - In Barry M. Loewer (ed.), Meaning in Mind: Fodor and His Critics. Cambridge: Blackwell. pp. 95--118.
Dominant and nondominant hemispherectomy.Flourens Haller - 1974 - In Marcel Kinsbourne & W. Smith (eds.), Hemispheric Disconnection and Cerebral Function. Charles C. pp. 5.
Granny's campaign for safe science.Daniel C. Dennett - 1991 - In Barry M. Loewer (ed.), Meaning in Mind: Fodor and His Critics. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Speaking up for Darwin.Ruth G. Millikan - 1991 - In Barry M. Loewer (ed.), Meaning in Mind: Fodor and His Critics. Cambridge: Blackwell. pp. 151-164.
Fodor, modularity, and speech perception.Irene Appelbaum - 1998 - Philosophical Psychology 11 (3):317-330.
Dispositions Indisposed: Semantic Atomism and Fodor’s Theory of Content.Robert D. Rupert - 2000 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 81 (3):325-349.
Fodor's causal theory of representation.H.-R. Cram - 1992 - Philosophical Quarterly 42 (166):56-70.
“X” means X: Semantics Fodor-style. [REVIEW]Fred Adams & Kenneth Aizawa - 1992 - Minds and Machines 2 (2):175-83.
Reply to Russow.Frederick Adams - 1993 - Philosophical Psychology 6 (1):63 – 65.
Fodor and psychological explanation.John Perry & David J. Israel - 1991 - In Barry M. Loewer (ed.), Meaning in Mind: Fodor and His Critics. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Concepts: Where Fodor went wrong.A. Levine & Mark H. Bickhard - 1999 - Philosophical Psychology 12 (1):5-23.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
18 (#832,589)

6 months
5 (#639,314)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

What do double dissociations prove?G. Van Orden - 2001 - Cognitive Science 25 (1):111-172.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Vision.David Marr - 1982 - W. H. Freeman.
Criticism and the growth of knowledge.Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.) - 1970 - Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press.
The Rediscovery of the Mind.John R. Searle - 1992 - MIT Press. Edited by Ned Block & Hilary Putnam.
Elements of Episodic Memory.Endel Tulving - 1983 - Oxford University Press.

View all 54 references / Add more references