On the epistemological foundations of the law of the lever


In this paper I challenge Paolo Palmieri’s reading of the Mach-Vailati debate on Archimedes’s proof of the law of the lever. I argue that the actual import of the debate concerns the possible epistemic (as opposed to merely pragmatic) role of mathematical arguments in empirical physics, and that construed in this light Vailati carries the upper hand. This claim is defended by showing that Archimedes’s proof of the law of the lever is not a way of appealing to a non-empirical source of information, but a way of explicating the mathematical structure that can represent the empirical information at our disposal in the most general way.


Added to PP

343 (#31,424)

6 months
15 (#54,272)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Archimedes.Daniel C. Lewis & E. J. Dijksterhuis - 1958 - American Journal of Philology 79 (2):221.
The Empirical Basis of Equilibrium: Mach, Vailati, and the Lever.Paolo Palmieri - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (1):42-53.

Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Democracy and Security.Annabelle Lever - 2013 - The Philosophers' Magazine 63 (4):99-110.
Saving Mach’s View on Atoms.Manuel Bächtold - 2010 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 41 (1):1 - 19.
Is Judicial Review Undemocratic?Annabelle Lever - 2009 - Perspectives on Politics 7 (4):897-915.
Where Are We Headed?J. Lever - 1970 - Grand Rapids: Mich., W. B. Eerdmans.
Ethics and the Patenting of Human Genes.Annabelle Lever - 2001 - Journal of Philosophy, Science and Law 1:31-46.
Compulsory Voting: A Critical Perspective.Annabelle Lever - 2010 - British Journal of Political Science 40:897-915.
Racial Profiling and Jury Trials.Annabelle Lever - 2009 - The Jury Expert 21 (1):20-35.