Kant and real numbers

Abstract

Kant held that under the concept of √2 falls a geometrical magnitude, but not a number. In particular, he explicitly distinguished this root from potentially infinite converging sequences of rationals. Like Kant, Brouwer based his foundations of mathematics on the a priori intuition of time, but unlike Kant, Brouwer did identify this root with a potentially infinite sequence. In this paper I discuss the systematical reasons why in Kant's philosophy this identification is impossible

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-02-14

Downloads
84 (#205,729)

6 months
13 (#219,908)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark van Atten
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Kant and the exact sciences.Michael Friedman - 1992 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Over de grondslagen der wiskunde.L. E. J. Brouwer - 1907 - Amsterdam-Leipzig: Maas & van Suchtelen.
Greek Mathematical Thought and the Origin of Algebra.Jacob Klein, Eva Brann & J. Winfree Smith - 1969 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 20 (4):374-375.

View all 16 references / Add more references