An Epistemic Separation Logic with Action Models

Journal of Logic, Language and Information 32 (1):89-116 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper we present an extension of (bunched) separation logic, Boolean BI, with epistemic and dynamic epistemic modalities. This logic, called action model separation logic ( \(\mathrm {AMSL}\) ), can be seen as a generalization of public announcement separation logic in which we replace public announcements with action models. Then we not only model public information change (public announcements) but also non-public forms of information change, such as private announcements. In this context the semantics for the connectives \(*\) and \(\mathrel {-*}\) from separation logic are epistemic versions of their usual semantics. This is because formulas are interpreted in states, not in resources, and agents may be uncertain between different states representing the same resource. We present the logic \(\mathrm {AMSL}\) and its semantics, with a detailed case study that highlights its interest for modeling. We also prove the elimination of the dynamics modalities and discuss some alternative epistemic semantics for the separation connectives.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dynamic graded epistemic logic.Minghui Ma & Hans van Ditmarsch - 2019 - Review of Symbolic Logic 12 (4):663-684.
Dynamic Epistemic Logic.Hans van Ditmarsch, Wiebe van der Hoek & Barteld Kooi - 2016 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Dynamic Epistemic Logic.Hans van Ditmarsch, and, Wiebe van der Hoek & Barteld Kooi - 2016 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Action models in inquisitive logic.Thom van Gessel - 2020 - Synthese 197 (9):3905-3945.
Action emulation.Jan van Eijck - 2012 - Synthese 185 (1):131-151.
Action emulation.Jan Eijck, Ji Ruan & Tomasz Sadzik - 2012 - Synthese 185 (S1):131-151.
Why Separation Logic Works.David Pym, Jonathan M. Spring & Peter O’Hearn - 2019 - Philosophy and Technology 32 (3):483-516.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-08-11

Downloads
24 (#657,113)

6 months
17 (#148,352)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Defaults in update semantics.Frank Veltman - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (3):221 - 261.
Logics of public communications.Jan Plaza - 2007 - Synthese 158 (2):165 - 179.

View all 12 references / Add more references