The right to know: ethical implications of antibody testing for healthcare workers and overlooked societal implications

Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (12):e74-e74 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

After the initial surge in cases of coronavirus, the outbreak has been managed differently in different countries. In the USA, it has been managed in many different ways between states, cities and even counties. This disparity is slowly becoming more and more pronounced with the advent of antibody testing. Although many argue over the potential merits of antibody testing as an immunity passport to allow the economy to restart, there are other implications that stand at the heart of the bioethical debate that are often overlooked. Particularly with COVID-19, there are many uncertainties and the discourse alone of antibodies presumes misinformation that may outweigh the epidemiological benefits of antibody testing. Although this paper does not seek to eliminate antibody testing, it does highlight the need for appropriate counselling both on a personal level with each patient but on a more global level. This moral standard of appropriate education is key to allowing the continued autonomy needed during this pandemic.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The ethics of HIV testing by physicians.Timothy F. Murphy - 1993 - Journal of Medical Humanities 14 (3):123-135.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-04

Downloads
26 (#610,935)

6 months
14 (#179,586)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references