- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Reply to David Papineau
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (2):712-715 (1994)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Reply to David Papineau.Peter Urbach - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (2):712-715.
Review of Peter Urbach and Colin Howson: Scientific reasoning: the Bayesian approach. [REVIEW]Barry Gower - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (1):126-131.
Review. Scientific reasoning: the Bayesian approach. Colin Howson, Peter Urbach.Barry Gower - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (1):126-131.
Review: Francis Bacon. Novum Organum (tr. and ed. by Peter Urbach and John Gibson). [REVIEW]J. R. Milton - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (1):125-128.
Review of David Papineau: Theory and meaning. [REVIEW]Alan Chalmers - 1982 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 33 (1):101-104.
Review of David Papineau: Philosophical Naturalism. Philosophical Naturalism. [REVIEW]Berent Enç - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (4):1070-1077.
Review of Homa Katouzian: Ideology and Method in Economics_; David Papineau: _For Science in the Social Sciences_; David Thomas: _Naturalism and social science: a post-empiricist philosophy of social science. [REVIEW]David-Hillel Ruben - 1981 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 32 (2):210-217.
Peter Urbach, "Francis Bacon's Philosophy of Science". [REVIEW]Michael Williams - 1989 - Philosophical Quarterly 39 (56):357.
Francis Bacon's Philosophy of Science: An Account and Reappraisal. Peter Urbach.Graham Rees - 1988 - Isis 79 (3):541-542.
Peter Urbach, Francis Bacon's Philosophy of Science: An Account and a Reappraisal Reviewed by.Alexander Rüger - 1988 - Philosophy in Review 8 (8):330-331.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
117 (#151,816)
6 months
10 (#382,402)
2009-01-28
Downloads
117 (#151,816)
6 months
10 (#382,402)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Why There’s No Cause to Randomize.John Worrall - 2007 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (3):451-488.
Hunting Side Effects and Explaining Them: Should We Reverse Evidence Hierarchies Upside Down?Barbara Osimani - 2014 - Topoi 33 (2):295-312.
Hunting side effects and explaining them: should we reverse evidence hierarchies upside down? [REVIEW]Barbara Osimani - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice (2):1-18.
Hierarchies of evidence in evidence-based medicine.Christopher Blunt - 2015 - Dissertation, London School of Economics
References found in this work
Scientific reasoning: the Bayesian approach.Peter Urbach & Colin Howson - 1993 - Chicago: Open Court. Edited by Peter Urbach.
Randomization and the design of experiments.Peter Urbach - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (2):256-273.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-7g5mb uwo