Review. Scientific reasoning: the Bayesian approach. Colin Howson, Peter Urbach
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (1):126-131 (1997)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)DOI
10.1093/bjps/48.1.126
My notes
Similar books and articles
On Chihara's ‘The Howson–Urbach Proofs of Bayesian Principles’.Colin Howson - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (1):83-90.
The Scope of Bayesian Reasoning.Henry Kyburg - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:139 - 152.
Bayesian versus non-Bayesian approaches to confirmation.Colin Howson & Peter Urbach - 2010 - In Antony Eagle (ed.), Philosophy of Probability: Contemporary Readings. Routledge.
On Chihara's ‘The Howson–Urbach Proofs of Bayesian Principles’.Colin Howson - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (1):83-90.
Bayesian Networks in Philosophy.Stephan Hartmann & Luc Bovens - 2002 - In Benedikt Lowe, Wolfgang Malzkorn & Thoralf Räsch (eds.), Foundations of The Formal Sciences II. Applications of Mathematical Logic in Philosophy and Linguistics [Trends in Logic]. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 39-46.
Why Bayesians Needn’t Be Afraid of Observing Many Non-black Non-ravens.Florian F. Schiller - 2012 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 43 (1):77-88.
Subjective Probabilities as Basis for Scientific Reasoning?Franz Huber - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (1):101-116.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-09-02
Downloads
50 (#237,153)
6 months
1 (#455,463)
2010-09-02
Downloads
50 (#237,153)
6 months
1 (#455,463)
Historical graph of downloads
