Eveline T. Feteris, Fundamental of Legal Argumentation: A Survey of Theories of Justification of Judicial Decisions (1999) [Book Review]

Argumentation 15 (2):223-229 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1023/a:1011157310039

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The rational reconstruction of weighing and balancing on the basis of teleological-evaluative considerations in the justification of judicial decisions.Eveline T. Feteris - 2008 - Ratio Juris 21 (4):481-495.
Comments on `Rhetoric and Dialectic: Some Historical and Legal Perspectives'.Eveline Feteris - 2000 - Argumentation 14 (3):235-239.
A Pragma-Dialectical Approach of the Analysis and Evaluation of Pragmatic Argumentation in a Legal Context.Eveline T. Feteris - 2002 - Argumentation 16 (3):349-367.
Editor's introduction.Eveline T. Feteris & Janice Schuetz - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (5):689-692.
A dialogical theory of legal discussions:Pragma-dialectical analysis and evaluation of legalargumentation.Eveline T. Feteris - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):115-135.
A Survey of 25 Years of Research on Legal Argumentation.E. T. Feteris - 1997 - Argumentation 11 (3):355-376.
Introduction: Dialectical legal argument: Formal and informal models. [REVIEW]Eveline Feteris & Henry Prakken - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):107-113.
Bibliography Argumentation Studies 1999.E. T. Feteris & P. Houtlosser - 2001 - Argumentation 15 (3):347-362.
Critical Notice of 'Fundamentos de la argumentación jurídica: revisión de las teorías sobre la justificación de las decisiones judiciales' by Evelin Feteris. [REVIEW]María G. Navarro - 2011 - Ideas Y Valores 60 (145):155-163.
Legal determinacy and moral justification.Jody S. Kraus - manuscript
DiaLaw. On legal justification and dialogical models of argumentation.Arno R. Lodder - 1999 - Dordrecht, Boston and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
The right to trial by jury.Thom Brooks - 2004 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (2):197–212.
Bibliography Argumentation Studies 1995.E. T. Feteris, R. Grootendorst & P. Houtlosser - 1997 - Argumentation 11 (2):237-258.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-11

Downloads
39 (#406,382)

6 months
4 (#775,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Evidential Foundations of Probabilistic Reasoning.David A. Schum - 1994 - New York, NY, USA: Wiley-Interscience.
How to Do Things with Rules.William Twining & David Miers - 2010 - Cambridge University Press.

Add more references