Noûs 43 (3):490-512 (2009)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Epistemic reasons are mental states. They are not propositions or non-mental facts. The discussion proceeds as follows. Section 1 introduces the topic. Section 2 gives two concrete examples of how our topic directly affects the internalism/externalism debate in normative epistemology. Section 3 responds to an argument against the view that reasons are mental states. Section 4 presents two problems for the view that reasons are propositions. Section 5 presents two problems for the view that reasons are non-mental facts. Section 6 argues that reasons are mental states. Section 7 responds to objections.
|
Keywords | Reasons ontology metaepistemology |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1111/j.1468-0068.2009.00715.x |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
View all 104 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
A Plea for Epistemic Excuses.Clayton Littlejohn - forthcoming - In Fabian Dorsch Julien Dutant (ed.), The New Evil Demon Problem. Oxford University Press.
Reasons for Action, Acting for Reasons, and Rationality.Maria Alvarez - 2018 - Synthese 195 (8):3293-3310.
View all 67 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
How to Be a Teleologist About Epistemic Reasons.Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen - 2011 - In Asbjorn Steglich-Petersen & Andrew Reisner (eds.), Reasons for Belief. Cambridge University Press. pp. 13--33.
Reasons for Belief, Reasoning, Virtues.Christopher Hookway - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 130 (1):47--70.
New Directions in Ethics: Naturalisms, Reasons and Virtue. [REVIEW]Soran Reader - 2000 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (4):341-364.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-08-01
Total views
722 ( #10,678 of 2,520,436 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
61 ( #13,039 of 2,520,436 )
2009-08-01
Total views
722 ( #10,678 of 2,520,436 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
61 ( #13,039 of 2,520,436 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads