Content-Related and Attitude-Related Reasons for Preferences

Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 59:155-182 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the first section of this paper I draw, on a purely conceptual level, a distinction between two kinds of reasons: content-related and attitude-related reasons. The established view is that, in the case of the attitude of believing something, there are no attitude-related reasons. I look at some arguments intended to establish this claim in the second section with an eye to whether these argument could be generalized to cover the case of preferences as well. In the third section I argue against such generalizations and present a case in favour of accepting attitude-related reasons for preferences. In the fourth section I present an objection to which I react in the fifth section where I try to strengthen my case for attitude-related reasons for preferences. Finally, I discuss and reject criticisms raised by two opponents of the view defended here.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
113 (#153,817)

6 months
18 (#135,061)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christian Piller
University of York

Citations of this work

Value theory.Mark Schroeder - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The independence of (in)coherence.Wooram Lee - 2021 - Synthese 199 (3-4):6563-6584.

View all 23 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

What we owe to each other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
The Nature of Rationality.Robert Nozick - 1994 - Princeton University Press.

View all 16 references / Add more references