The Structure of Scientific Fraud: The Relationship Between Paradigms and Misconduct

In Mark Addis, Fernand Gobet & Peter Sozou (eds.), Scientific Discovery in the Social Sciences. Springer Verlag (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Misconduct in science and the German law.Stefanic Stegemann-Bochl - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):57-62.
Using Criminalization and Due Process to Reduce Scientific Misconduct.Benjamin K. Sovacool - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (5):W1-W7.
Scientific Integrity in Brazil.Liliane Lins & Fernando Martins Carvalho - 2014 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 11 (3):283-287.
Process and detection in fraud and deceit.Sam Silverman - 1994 - Ethics and Behavior 4 (3):219 – 228.
Criminals in the citadel and deceit all along the watchtower: Irresponsibility, fraud, and complicity in the search for scientific truth.Prathap Tharyan - 2012 - Mens Sana Monographs 10 (1):158.
Science as a Matter of Honour: How Accused Scientists Deal with Scientific Fraud in Japan.Pablo A. Pellegrini - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (4):1297-1313.
Impure Science: Fraud, Compromise, and Political Influence in Scientific Research by Robert Bell; Stealing into Print: Fraud, Plagiarism, and Misconduct in Scientific Publishing by Marcel C. LaFollette.Nicholas Steneck - 1993 - Isis 84:833-834.
The Scientific Ponzi Scheme.Kevin J. S. Zollman - unknown
Exploring scientific misconduct: Isolated individuals, impure institutions, or an inevitable idiom of modern science? [REVIEW]Benjamin K. Sovacool - 2008 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5 (4):271-282.
Lack of Improvement in Scientific Integrity: An Analysis of WoS Retractions by Chinese Researchers.Lei Lei & Ying Zhang - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (5):1409-1420.
Changing explanatory frameworks in the U.S. government’s attempt to define research misconduct.David H. Guston - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):137-154.
Peirce and Royce and the Betrayal of Science: Scientific Fraud and Misconduct.Jacquelyn Anne K. Kegley - 2010 - The Pluralist 5 (2):87-104.
Accountability and responsibility in research.Patricia K. Woolf - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (8):595 - 600.
Stealing Into Print: Fraud, Plagiarism, and Misconduct in Scientific Publishing.Marcel C. LaFollette - 1996 - Univ of California Press.
Business Ethics Perspectives: Faculty Plagiarism and Fraud. [REVIEW]Teressa L. Elliott, Linda M. Marquis & Catherine S. Neal - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 112 (1):91-99.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-09-13

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references