The limits of libertarianism in debates over euthanasia and the application of moral fictionalism in bioethics

Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 10 (1-2):30-39 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This text focuses on selected basic arguments of libertarianism that could be found in certain debates on the moral issues of euthanasia and the application of moral fictionalism in bioethics. Firstly, I devote my article to the criticism of libertarian arguments (as one of the dominant discourses related to the debate over euthanasia) in a wider perspective of moral philosophy. The article is based on an approach that understands morality as a kind of social practice and the primary goal is to grasp the key theoretical concepts which are included in the mechanism for identifying and assessing our moral intuitions. This text is primarily an analysis of selected arguments of current normative theories of libertarianism on two levels: first it examines the idea of self-ownership in connection with certain debates over euthanasia, while the latter part of the article concerns an analysis of the critique of libertarian arguments and a comparison of the alternative arguments of moral fictionalism. The last part of this text, focusing on moral fictionalism and its general application in bioethics, is the core of the article.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Moral Fictionalism.Daniel Nolan - 2012 - Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Return of Moral Fictionalism.Nadeem J. Z. Hussain - 2004 - Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):149–188.
Morality is not good.Samuel Green - 2011 - Emergent Australasian Philosophers 4 (1).
A dilemma for moral fictionalism.Matthew Chrisman - 2007 - Philosophical Books 49 (1):4-13.
Moral fictionalism versus the rest.Daniel Nolan, Greg Restall & Caroline West - 2005 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (3):307 – 330.
Against Moral Fictionalism.Stan Husi - 2014 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 11 (1):80-96.
Moral Fictionalism. [REVIEW]Tristram McPherson - 2008 - Philosophical Review 117 (3):445-448.
Daoist Metaethics.Jason Dockstader - 2019 - Journal of Value Inquiry 53 (2):309-324.
Reactionary Moral Fictionalism.Jason Dockstader - 2020 - Philosophia 48 (2):519-534.
Moral Permissibility of Euthanasia: A Case Discussion from Bangladesh.Azam Golam - 2007 - The Dhaka University Studies 63 (2):157-169.
Moral Skepticism: New Essays.Diego E. Machuca (ed.) - 2018 - New York: Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-20

Downloads
12 (#1,080,675)

6 months
3 (#962,988)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The moral problem.Michael Smith - 1994 - Cambridge, Mass., USA: Blackwell.
Principia ethica.George Edward Moore - 1903 - Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications. Edited by Thomas Baldwin.
Two treatises of government.John Locke - 1698 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Peter Laslett.

View all 24 references / Add more references