Puzzles and peculiarities: How scientists attend to and process anomalies during data analysis

In M. Gorman, R. Tweney, D. Gooding & A. Kincannon (eds.), Scientific and Technological Thinking. Erlbaum. pp. 97--118 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Scientists' Responses to Anomalous Data: Evidence from Psychology, History, and Philosophy of Science.William F. Brewer & Clark A. Chinn - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:304 - 313.
Anomalies and Coherence: A Case Study from Astronomy. [REVIEW]Ulrich Gähde - 2012 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 43 (2):347-359.
Temporal Anomalies of Consciousness.Daniel C. Dennett - 1992 - In Y. Christen & P.S. Churchland (eds.), Neurophilosophy and Alzheimer's Disease. Springer Verlag. pp. 5--17.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-31

Downloads
33 (#482,049)

6 months
5 (#626,659)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Visualizing Scientific Inference.David C. Gooding - 2010 - Topics in Cognitive Science 2 (1):15-35.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Proofs and refutations (IV).I. Lakatos - 1963 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 14 (56):296-342.
Proofs and Refutations.Imre Lakatos - 1980 - Noûs 14 (3):474-478.
Model-based reasoning in conceptual change.Nancy J. Nersessian - 1999 - In L. Magnani, N. J. Nersessian & P. Thagard (eds.), Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery. Kluwer/Plenum. pp. 5--22.

View all 9 references / Add more references