Competing World Views: Perspectivism and Polemics in the Satya-śāsana-parīkṣā and Other Jaina Works [Book Review]

Journal of Indian Philosophy 40 (1):25-45 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Jaina authors use a pluralistic epistemological model as a tool to claim the superiority of Jainism over the other schools of Indian thought. In this article the general tendency of the Jaina’s epistemic pluralism is discussed and it is shown how the Digambara Jaina Vidyānandin tries to establish the Jainas’ pluralism on rational grounds by identifying erroneous epistemic alternatives through methodological falsification.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Epistemic Pluralism: From Systems to Stances.Jonardon Ganeri - 2019 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 5 (1):1-21.
Kundakunda bhāratī. Kundakunda - 2012 - Meraṭha: Śruta Saṃvarddhana Saṃsthāna. Edited by Pannālāla Jaina & Kundakunda.
Prameyaratnamālā. Anantavīrya - 1992 - [Sonāgira, Datiyā, Ma. Pra.]: Bhāratavarṣīya Anekānta Vidvat Pariṣad. Edited by Rameśacandra Jaina & Māṇikyanandī.
Sacred Philosophy.Champat Rai Jain - 2020 - Independently Published.
Jaina tradition in Indian thought.Hīrālāla Jaina - 2002 - Delhi: Sharada Pub. House. Edited by Hīrālāla Jaina & Dharmacandra Jaina.
Jaina tradition in Indian thought.Håiråalåala Jaina - 2002 - Delhi: Sharada Pub. House. Edited by Dharamacanda Jaina.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-02-07

Downloads
37 (#118,170)

6 months
4 (#1,635,958)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Himal Trikha
University of Vienna

References found in this work

Review of H. SPINNER: Pluralismus als Erkenntnismodell[REVIEW]Alfred Schramm - 1979 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30 (1):90-93.
Reviews. [REVIEW]Alfred Schramm - 1979 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30 (1):90-93.

Add more references