The responsibility for the other and The Responsibility to Protect

Philosophy and Social Criticism 40 (3):269-288 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article analyses various ways to articulate the ethical investigations of French philosopher Emmanuel Levinas with the doctrine of the responsibility to protect. In response to genocide and mass atrocity, an imperative to understand responsibility in a broader and more forceful way entails in both cases a new and analogous revision of the related concepts of identity and sovereignty. A basic complementarity of Levinas’ ethics with the responsibility to protect is ascertained: while Levinas’ ethical investigations can indeed bring a philosophical basis to the responsibility to protect, the latter can, in a limited way, be construed as practical policy implications of the former

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethical Experience and the Motives for Practical Rationality.Michael D. Barber - 2007 - International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (4):425-441.
Levinas, bureaucracy, and the ethics of school leadership.Andrew Pendola - 2019 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 51 (14):1528-1540.
Ethical action of a teacher in Levinas’ ethics of responsibility.Kosmas Sobon - 2018 - International Journal of Ethics Education 3 (2):157-168.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-05

Downloads
18 (#825,698)

6 months
5 (#836,975)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Humanitarian intervention: An overview of the ethical issues.Michael J. Smith - 1998 - Ethics and International Affairs 12:63–79.
Evil and the temptation of theodicy.Richard J. Bernstein - 2002 - In Robert Bernasconi & Simon Critchley (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Lévinas. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 252--267.

Add more references