Pluralism and Responsibility in Post-Modern Science

Science, Technology, and Human Values 10 (1):28-37 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1177/016224398501000105

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Pluralism, indeterminacy and the social sciences: Reply to Ingram and Meehan. [REVIEW]James Bohman - 1997 - Human Studies 20 (4):441-458.
Postmodern: an attribute deaxiologization.D. Shishkin - 2011 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 1 (21):34-39.
New Philosophy of Social Science: Problems of Indeterminacy.[author unknown] - 1997 - Human Studies 20 (4):441-458.
New Philosophy of Social Science: Problems of Indeterminacy.Paul A. Roth - 1995 - Metaphilosophy 26 (4):440-448.
New Philosophy of Social Science: Problems of Indeterminacy.James Bohman - 1993 - MIT Press.
The American Asian Literary Criticism and the Post-modernization.Yu-bei Zhou - 2009 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 5:43-50.
Post-secular society, transnational religious civilizations and legal pluralism.Massimo Rosati - 2010 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (3-4):413-423.
Scientific Pluralism.Stephen H. Kellert, Helen E. Longino & C. Kenneth Waters (eds.) - 1956 - Univ of Minnesota Press.
uBuntu, Pluralism and the Responsibility of Legal Academics to the New South Africa.Drucilla Cornell - 2009 - Law and Critique 20 (1):43-58.
Pluralism, logical empiricism, and the problem of pseudoscience.George A. Reisch - 1998 - Philosophy of Science 65 (2):333-348.
The post-modern and the post-industrial: a critical analysis.Margaret A. Rose - 1991 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pluralists about Pluralism? Versions of Explanatory Pluralism in Psychiatry.Jeroen Van Bouwel - 2014 - In M. C. Galavotti, D. Dieks, W. J. Gonzalez, S. Hartmann, Th Uebel & M. Weber (eds.), New Directions in Philosophy of Science (The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective Series). Springer. pp. 105-119.
Co-responsibility for research integrity.Carl Mitcham - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):273-290.
Why Do Theologians Need to be Scientists?Stanley J. Grenz - 2000 - Zygon 35 (2):331-356.
The Reenchantment of Science: Postmodern Proposals.David Ray Griffin (ed.) - 1988 - State University of New York Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-27

Downloads
2 (#1,790,546)

6 months
2 (#1,229,212)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references