The Meaning of Illness

Hastings Center Report 23 (6):41 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is my purpose in this thesis to explore the "reality" of illness, using philosophical phenomenology as a guide. In particular, I am concerned to show that the experience of illness, rather than representing a shared "reality" between physician and patient, represents in effect two quite distinct "realities". Philosophical phenomenology focuses on the nature of experience, and particularly upon the manner in which all experience is structured by the activity of consciousness. In so doing phenomenology emphasizes the unique nature of experiencing and particularly the correlation between the perceiver and that which is perceived. Meaning is seen to be a function of the activity of individual consciousness. In the first chapter consideration is given to some basic concepts which are fundamental for phenomenology and a distinction is made between "own world" and "common world." In the second chapter these concepts are shown to provide insights into the nature of the discrepancy between the physician's and the patient's understanding of illness. Consideration is given to the manner in which the separate worlds of the physician and patient are constituted. It is argued that it is through attentional focusing that the sense of illness is made explicit for the individual. An analysis is provided of the manner in which such attentional focusing is determined. In the third chapter consideration is given to the question of how it is possible to construct a shared world of meaning between patient and physician, given the unique nature of experiencing. An eidetic interpretation of illness is proposed and attention is directed towards some ways in which we do, in fact, come to some understanding of the Other. In the final chapter it is suggested that the notion of healing presupposes a shared world between physician and patient. A distinction is made between healing and curing disease. It is noted that the manner in which the "reality" of illness is defined directly influences the way in which the end of the patient/physician relationship is defined. It is argued that the end of the patient/ physician relationship is healing and that healing is a mutual act which is accomplished within the context of a shared world between physician and patient.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Postmodernist theory and the physician-patient relationship.Nelly Tsouyopoulos - 1994 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 15 (3).
The Meaning of Illness. [REVIEW]Erik Parens & S. Kay Toombs - 1993 - Hastings Center Report 23 (6):41.
The temporality of illness: Four levels of experience.S. Kay Toombs - 1990 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 11 (3).
Toward a reconstruction of medical morality.Edmund D. Pellegrino - 1987 - Journal of Medical Humanities and Bioethics 8 (1):7-18.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-18

Downloads
37 (#419,474)

6 months
13 (#277,486)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Feminist Phenomenology and Medicine.Kristin Zeiler & Lisa Folkmarson Käll (eds.) - 2014 - State University of New York Press.
The Causal Explanatory Functions of Medical Diagnoses.Hane Htut Maung - 2017 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 38 (1):41-59.
Why Feminist Phenomenology and Medicine?Lisa Folkmarson Käll & Kristin Zeiler - 2014 - In Kristin Zeiler & Lisa Folkmarson Käll (eds.), Feminist Phenomenology and Medicine. State University of New York Press. pp. 1-25.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references