A Few Short Steps to the Gallows

Abstract

Our justification for punishing the wrong doer is not that we are enacting God-like retribution. Neither do we have to argue that inflicting the punishment will make any person, living or dead, happier or better off. We punish to keep a promise to the victims: a promise made before they were victims, a promise they were entitled to ask for; that we were entitled to give and that we are now obliged to honor.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Getting Even Again.Charles Barton - 2000 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (1):129-142.
Punishment: Consequentialism.David Wood - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (6):455-469.
Retributive parsimony.Richard L. Lippke - 2009 - Res Publica 15 (4):377-395.
A Retributive Argument Against Punishment.Greg Roebuck & David Wood - 2011 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (1):73-86.
The Rise and Fall of the Mixed Theory of Punishment.Whitley Kaufman - 2008 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (1):37-57.
Making sense of retributivism.J. Angelo Corlett - 2001 - Philosophy 76 (1):77-110.
Political Neutrality and Punishment.Matt Matravers - 2013 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (2):217-230.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-05-07

Downloads
25 (#620,961)

6 months
3 (#992,575)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Terrance A. Tomkow
Cambridge University (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references