The greatest possible being needn't be anything impossible

Religious Studies 51 (4):531-542 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There are various argumentative strategies for advancing the claim that God does not exist. One such strategy is this. First, one notes that God is meant to have a certain divine attribute (such as omniscience). One then argues that having the relevant attribute is impossible. One concludes that God doesn't exist. For instance, Dennis Whitcomb's recent paper, ‘Grounding and omniscience’, proceeds in exactly this way. As Whitcomb says, ‘I'm going to argue that omniscience is impossible and that therefore there is no God.’ This is not, I hope to show, a very promising way to start a paper. If having a given property is impossible, the greatest possible being need not have that property. Accordingly, the argumentative strategy in question is doomed to failure. The upshot of this article is a quite general one concerning how arguments against the existence of God in fact must proceed.

Similar books and articles

Is omniscience impossible?Rik Peels - 2013 - Religious Studies 49 (4):481-490.
Consciousness and the Nonexistence of God.Greg Janzen - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Research 38:1-25.
Sceptical Theism and Divine Lies.Erik J. Wielenberg - 2010 - Religious Studies 46 (4):509-523.
Skeptical theism.Justin McBrayer - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (7):611-623.
Logic and Theism.Graham Oppy - 2006 - Philo 9 (1):73-91.
Mackie on miracles.Bruce Langtry - 1988 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 66 (3):368-375.
Is Theism Really a Miracle?Alvin Plantinga - 1986 - Faith and Philosophy 3 (2):109-134.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-11-12

Downloads
372 (#31,060)

6 months
8 (#105,488)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Patrick Todd
University of Edinburgh

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Grounding and Omniscience.Dennis Whitcomb - 2012 - Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion 4 (1).
A new defence of Anselmian theism.Yujin Nagasawa - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (233):577-596.
Omnipotence and God's Ability to Sin.Nelson Pike - 1969 - American Philosophical Quarterly 6 (3):208 - 216.
The modal ontological argument.R. Kane - 1984 - Mind 93 (371):336-350.

View all 11 references / Add more references