Education as Spectacle

Educational Philosophy and Theory 47 (9):904-917 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Global economic and advanced capitalist agendas have taken on ideological dimensions that are flat, precise and which assert ‘undeniable’ facts. These agendas are gradually shaping a society and its education based on consumerism and a global economic order which is ‘not accidentally or superficially spectacular, it is fundamentally spectaclist. In the spectacle … goals are nothing, development is everything. The spectacle aims at nothing other than itself’. In this paper, I argue, in line with Debord, that teachers’ work has moved from being predominantly controlled by technicist accountability and pedagogical conformity to become a form of decentred labour. Teachers’ work has been transformed into the role of spectator, one who is destined to simply monitor events in the classroom and in technologized environments, caught between the economic world view and student consumer desire. In such a view, the teacher can do little more than watch while education, subjugated to economic dogma and digitized appearances, presents life as a spectacle of accumulation and desire.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-03

Downloads
20 (#181,865)

6 months
7 (#1,397,300)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Difference and repetition.Gilles Deleuze - 1994 - London: Athlone Press.
Art as Experience.John Dewey - 2005 - Penguin Books.
Logic: The Theory of Inquiry.John Dewey - 1938 - New York, NY, USA: Henry Holt.
Art as Experience.John Dewey - 1934 - New Yorke: Perigee Books.

View all 14 references / Add more references